Tag definitions:
- vigilante_violence: A character takes justice -- or their idea of it -- into their own hands, killing and maiming people outside of "color of law" in an attempt to provide a level of "justice" they feel the law won't or can't provide. For this tag to apply, the film must establish that the law has failed to act (Death Wish), or is unlikely due to corruption or some other known reason to act adequately, at least in the mind of the vigilante (The Beekeeper). A person killing and maiming *under* "color of law" (Stallone in Cobra) is not a vigilante, even if they exceed their legal authority. A person killing for revenge who does so because that is their preference, and not because of a failing of the law (John Wick) is not a vigilante. Dirty Harry, who tries the right way, fails, then acts outside the law (and throws off his badge) is arguably a vigilante because he has explicitly rejected acting under "color of law". The three keys: the law must be shown to be ineffective, the person must be seeking justice for the innocent, and the vigilante must act in a way that the law will not protect, sanction, or defend should they be caught.

Films:
1. Jesus' Son (1999)
2. The New Land (1972)
3. Mars Needs Moms (2011)
4. The Brother from Another Planet (1984)
5. Carefree (1938)
6. Un carnet de bal (1937)
7. The Lord of the Rings (1978)
8. The Joy of Singing (2008)
9. The Color Purple (2023)
10. The Prince of Tides (1991)

Judge each film from your internal knowledge only, no web searches. Read the whole definition, then decide whether it describes the film. The tag applies only if the definition holds as a whole, not just parts. Give one sentence of reasoning per film, then the verdict line. If the tag describes a plot engine in the heart of the film, read the definition as describing how a first view audience perceives the situation while watching the heart of the film; for instance, do not disqualify The Usual Suspects as being a ragtag_band simply because at the end we learn this is a made up story. Example lists are illustrative, not required clauses. Do not invent additional requirements beyond the definition. Co-occurring tags are fine. The verdict line: the film's number from the list above, a colon, then the comma-separated tag slugs that apply, or the word none — for example `3: outsider_goes_native` or `7: none`. The verdict line must contain nothing but the number, the colon, and the slugs (or none).